Skip to content

Create SECURITY.md for security policy and reporting - #2202

Open
lisagorewitdecker wants to merge 1 commit into
trekhleb:masterfrom
lisagorewitdecker:patch-5
Open

Create SECURITY.md for security policy and reporting#2202
lisagorewitdecker wants to merge 1 commit into
trekhleb:masterfrom
lisagorewitdecker:patch-5

Conversation

@lisagorewitdecker

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Added a security policy document outlining supported versions and vulnerability reporting.

Added a security policy document outlining supported versions and vulnerability reporting.
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 26, 2026 16:47

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

馃煛 Changes recommended

The new SECURITY.md largely contains placeholder/template text and does not yet provide an actionable, repo-specific support policy or vulnerability reporting channel.

Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.

Pull request overview

Adds a SECURITY.md file to document the repository鈥檚 security support policy and vulnerability reporting process, aligning with common GitHub repository hygiene.

Changes:

  • Introduced SECURITY.md with sections for supported versions and vulnerability reporting.
  • Added an initial supported-version matrix and reporting guidance (currently template content).
File summaries
File Description
SECURITY.md Adds a security policy document intended to describe supported versions and how to report vulnerabilities.
Review details

Suppressed comments (1)

SECURITY.md:21

  • The vulnerability reporting guidance is still placeholder text and does not provide an actionable reporting channel (e.g., GitHub Security Advisories link, a security contact email, expected response SLA).
Use this section to tell people how to report a vulnerability.

Tell them where to go, how often they can expect to get an update on a
reported vulnerability, what to expect if the vulnerability is accepted or
declined, etc.
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1
  • Review effort level: Lite

馃挕 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread SECURITY.md
Comment on lines +5 to +13
Use this section to tell people about which versions of your project are
currently being supported with security updates.

| Version | Supported |
| ------- | ------------------ |
| 5.1.x | :white_check_mark: |
| 5.0.x | :x: |
| 4.0.x | :white_check_mark: |
| < 4.0 | :x: |

@lisagorewitdecker lisagorewitdecker left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants