gh-93618: Document the memory usage of the incremental parsers - #156763
Merged
serhiy-storchaka merged 1 commit intoSep 13, 2026
Merged
serhiy-storchaka merged 1 commit into
serhiy-storchaka merged 1 commit into
Conversation
It was said that iterparse() can be useful for reading a large document without holding it wholly in memory, but the tree is only built incrementally, it is not freed incrementally. Document how to remove the processed elements, and that a custom target does not build a tree at all.
Documentation build overview
|
serhiy-storchaka
added
needs backport to 3.13
|
Thanks @serhiy-storchaka for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13, 3.14, 3.15. |
|
GH-157419 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.15 branch. |
bedevere-app
Bot
removed
the
needs backport to 3.15
|
GH-157420 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
|
GH-157421 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
serhiy-storchaka
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2026
…GH-156763) (GH-157420) It was said that iterparse() can be useful for reading a large document without holding it wholly in memory, but the tree is only built incrementally, it is not freed incrementally. Document how to remove the processed elements, and that a custom target does not build a tree at all. (cherry picked from commit e7a3937) Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
serhiy-storchaka
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2026
…GH-156763) (GH-157421) It was said that iterparse() can be useful for reading a large document without holding it wholly in memory, but the tree is only built incrementally, it is not freed incrementally. Document how to remove the processed elements, and that a custom target does not build a tree at all. (cherry picked from commit e7a3937) Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
johnslavik
pushed a commit
to johnslavik/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2026
…ythonGH-156763) It was said that iterparse() can be useful for reading a large document without holding it wholly in memory, but the tree is only built incrementally, it is not freed incrementally. Document how to remove the processed elements, and that a custom target does not build a tree at all.
hugovk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2026
…GH-156763) (#157419) Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The documentation said that
iterparse()"can be useful when you're reading a large XML document and don't want to hold it wholly in memory", but the tree is only built incrementally, it is not freed incrementally: every parsed element is kept until the whole document is read.The claim is replaced with an explanation and two examples for common cases: clearing large processed elements, and removing the processed children of an element with many of them. Both are in the "Pull API for non-blocking parsing" section, because this applies to
XMLPullParseras well.They are not universal, they only give an idea; the note ends with the way to avoid the tree entirely, an
XMLParserwith a custom target.iterparse#93618