Skip to content

docs: adopt organization-balanced governance voting - #93

Merged
yada merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
governance/org-balanced-voting
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

docs: adopt organization-balanced governance voting#93
yada merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
governance/org-balanced-voting

Conversation

@yada

@yada yada commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Introduce organization-balanced voting for formal governance decisions, with one vote per affiliation.
  • Keep routine technical decisions under lazy consensus and individual Maintainer authority.
  • Define public voting, approval thresholds, affiliation handling, abstentions and recusals.
  • Align Maintainer appointment and removal, conflict resolution and governance amendments with the new rules.
  • Require Maintainer affiliations to remain current in MAINTAINERS.md.

Rationale

This change addresses the organization-balance recommendation raised during the CNCF governance review. It prevents a single organization from reaching a governance supermajority through Maintainer headcount alone.

With the current Maintainer affiliations, Postman and AXA France each have one organizational vote. A formal governance decision therefore requires support from both affiliations.

This amendment must be approved under the governance rules currently present on main: approval from at least 66% (two-thirds) of the current Maintainers through PR review or vote. The organization-balanced rules take effect only after this PR is approved and merged.

Changed files

  • GOVERNANCE.md
  • MAINTAINERS.md

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • Confirmed that the commit contains only the two governance files above.

References

Signed-off-by: Yacine Kheddache <yacine@microcks.io>
@yada yada self-assigned this Sep 7, 2026
@yada yada added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 7, 2026
@yada

yada commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Formal Maintainer Vote

This pull request changes the Microcks governance model. It must be approved under the governance rules currently present on main.

All current Maintainers are invited to vote by replying:

  • +1 — Approve
  • 0 — Abstain
  • -1 — Reject, with an explanation

Approval requires at least 2 of the 3 current Maintainers.

Although not required by the current rules, support from both represented affiliations is requested because this proposal introduces organization-balanced governance.

The vote closes on September 21, 2026 at 23:59 UTC, or earlier if all Maintainers vote and the outcome is final.

@lbroudoux @SebastienDegodez

My vote: +1 (binding).

Comment thread GOVERNANCE.md
@SebastienDegodez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

My vote: +1 (binding)

1 similar comment
@lbroudoux

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

My vote: +1 (binding)

@yada

yada commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Vote passed at 100%

@yada
yada merged commit 10a7fda into main Sep 8, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants