Refactor keyword aliases behind a compatibility layer - #818
Open
cvanelteren wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Continuation of our discussion in #808
UltraPlot has many (many many) aliases. Some love them, some hate them. This PR proposes to move them away from function signatures, to remain with a smaller set, and pushing the rest into a specific decorator. This allows for a smaller function description in stuff like pylance.
I added a small applet in the docs that shows all the aliases, and shows where they can be added etc. Open for feedback!