Skip to content

bug(podman): workload gets no /etc/resolv.conf under network:none, unlike Docker's nameserver 127.0.0.53 #3645

Description

@politerealism

User Story

As an operator running sandboxes via the Podman driver, I want DNS resolution to work the same way it does with Docker, so sandboxed processes can resolve policy-permitted hostnames without a manual workaround.

Problem Statement

Podman workload containers run with NetworkMode: none (per RFC 0012's isolation model), and Podman does not manage DNS for network-less containers at all — /etc/resolv.conf is left exactly as whatever the base image happens to ship. The Docker driver, by contrast, explicitly configures nameserver 127.0.0.53 in the workload's /etc/resolv.conf, which the sandbox's DNS mediation (network_broker.rs's classify_send) specifically relays only when the destination matches that exact relay address. Podman workloads get no equivalent configuration.

Impact / Why This Matters

Confirmed independently twice:

Any real-world Podman deployment using a base image that doesn't already happen to ship the 127.0.0.53 convention will silently fail DNS resolution for every sandboxed process — including for hostnames the policy explicitly allows — with a generic DNS lookup error rather than any actionable diagnostic pointing at the real cause.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The Podman driver explicitly writes or mounts /etc/resolv.conf (pointing at the sandbox's internal DNS relay address) into the workload container at creation time, matching Docker's behavior, regardless of what the base image ships
  • This does not depend on Podman's own network-mode-specific DNS management, since network: none skips that entirely
  • Behavior is consistent across rootful and rootless Podman
  • A regression test covers DNS resolution working correctly from a Podman-driven sandbox using a base image with no pre-existing DNS relay convention

Reproduction Steps

  1. Create a Podman-driven sandbox from an image with no nameserver 127.0.0.53 baked into /etc/resolv.conf (e.g. ghcr.io/astral-sh/uv:python3.12-bookworm-slim).
  2. Apply a policy allowing a specific hostname (openshell policy update --wait --binary <bin> --add-endpoint <host>:443:read-only <sandbox>).
  3. Attempt to resolve that hostname inside the sandbox (getent hosts <host>).
  4. Resolution fails with a DNS error, even though the host is explicitly policy-permitted.

Environment

Related: #3396, PR #3642 (follow-ups section)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

state:acceptedA maintainer decided OpenShell should pursue this issue

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions