fix: prevent duplicate font family entries in FontFactoryImp

[garcia-d]

Description of the new Feature/Bugfix

FontFactoryImp.registerFamily appended a [familyName, fullName] pair to
its internal family list on every call, even when that exact pair was
already registered. Repeated registration of the same font grew the list
unboundedly and slowed down font lookup over time.

Guarded the insertion path with a contains check so the same
familyName/fullName pair is only ever added once. Added a package-private
getRegisteredFamily accessor and a unit test covering the deduplication
invariant.

Related Issue: none (found during code review, not tied to a filed issue)

Unit-Tests for the new Feature/Bugfix

• Unit-Tests added to reproduce the bug
• Unit-Tests added to the added feature

Compatibilities Issues

No behavioral change for callers - registerFamily still registers the
pair, just without duplicating it on repeat calls. No existing method
signatures changed; getRegisteredFamily is a new package-private
accessor, added only for the test.

Your real name

Diego Garcia

Testing details

Added FontFactoryImpTest coverage for the dedup invariant. Full
openpdf test suite run locally with no regressions.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 111 complexity · 4 duplication

Metric	Results
Complexity	111
Duplication	4

View in Codacy

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[garcia-d]

Hi @asturio,

This PR backports the font family duplicate-registration fix to the 2.0-java17 branch. The same fix has been opened for every active branch: #1621 (1.3-java8), #1622 (1.4-java11), #1624 (2.2-java21), #1625 (2.4), #1626 (master).

Whenever you get a chance, I'd appreciate your review, and if it looks good, approval/merge into 2.0-java17.

I'd also kindly ask, once merged, if an official release including this fix could be cut — particularly for the Java 8-compatible line (#1621), since I'd rather rely on an official release than patch it in locally.

Thanks for maintaining OpenPDF!