Skip to content

re-add preview for lasso/enet - #224

Open
ethanglaser wants to merge 2 commits into
IntelPython:mainfrom
ethanglaser:dev/eglaser-lasso-preview
Open

re-add preview for lasso/enet#224
ethanglaser wants to merge 2 commits into
IntelPython:mainfrom
ethanglaser:dev/eglaser-lasso-preview

Conversation

@ethanglaser

@ethanglaser ethanglaser commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Ref: #168, #185, uxlfoundation/scikit-learn-intelex#3418

CI on main: http://intel-ci.intel.com/f1a99f30-60cb-f12e-bffe-724646f3d540
CI on this branch without #223: http://intel-ci.intel.com/f1aca544-6b9a-f1c2-935d-724646f3d540
CI on this branch current state with #223: http://intel-ci.intel.com/f1acc416-9050-f195-aecb-724646f3d540

Checklist:

Completeness and readability

  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes or created a separate PR with updates and provided its number in the description, if necessary.
  • Git commit message contains an appropriate signed-off-by string (see CONTRIBUTING.md for details).
  • I have resolved any merge conflicts that might occur with the base branch.

Testing

  • I have run it locally and tested the changes extensively.
  • All CI jobs are green or I have provided justification why they aren't.
  • I have extended testing suite if new functionality was introduced in this PR.

Depends on #223 (n_jobs KeyError fix). That commit is included in this branch so CI can pass; it will drop out of this diff once #223 merges and this branch is rebased.

ethanglaser and others added 2 commits September 9, 2026 19:49
IntelPython#219 added a block that drops the `n_jobs` column when it is partially
NaN, but the pre-existing access below it was left unguarded, so any
`--compatibility-mode` report over more than one environment_name raises
KeyError: 'n_jobs'.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ethanglaser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The predicament of needing this update for private CI with main sklearnex branch but it failing in public CI...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant